
First Abu Dhabi Bank issues a $300M fixed-rate bond due 2031 under its EMTN programme. Here's why this matters for Gulf investors and UAE finance.
First Abu Dhabi Bank has launched a $300 million fixed-rate bond maturing in 2031, the latest issuance under its Euro Medium-Term Note programme. The move signals continued appetite among Gulf financial institutions to tap international debt markets and lock in longer-term funding at fixed rates.

The issuance, designated Series 196 under FAB’s EMTN programme, carries a fixed coupon and a tenor running to 2031. Euro Medium-Term Note programmes are standing frameworks that allow banks to issue bonds in multiple tranches without filing fresh regulatory paperwork each time, making them a preferred tool for large financial institutions looking to raise capital efficiently.
FAB, the UAE’s largest bank by assets, regularly accesses international bond markets through this structure. The $300 million size places this squarely in the mid-tier range for Gulf sovereign and quasi-sovereign issuers, large enough to attract institutional interest, modest enough to price without disrupting the market.
Banks use bond issuances to diversify their funding base beyond customer deposits and short-term interbank lending. A fixed-rate instrument due 2031 gives FAB a predictable cost of funds for roughly six years, useful for matching against longer-duration loan books such as infrastructure and project finance, sectors where Abu Dhabi remains heavily active.
It also signals confidence. Institutional investors, pension funds, and asset managers buy these instruments, and demand tells you something about how the market views the issuer’s creditworthiness. FAB carries strong investment-grade ratings from major agencies, which keeps borrowing costs competitive.
Gulf banks have been active in global bond markets over the past two years as regional economies expand on the back of infrastructure spending, tourism growth, and economic diversification programmes. UAE-based banks in particular are financing a wave of projects tied to national visions in Abu Dhabi and Dubai.
A fixed-rate bond also hedges against rate uncertainty. After an aggressive global rate-hiking cycle, locking in funding costs for six years is a deliberate treasury decision, not a passive one. For Gulf investors holding FAB paper, fixed income from a top-tier regional bank offers relative stability compared to equity markets.
An EMTN programme is essentially a pre-approved borrowing shelf. Once a bank or sovereign sets it up, it can issue bonds in various currencies, sizes, and tenors relatively quickly. For retail and institutional investors in the Gulf, bonds issued under these programmes are often listed on exchanges and can be traded on secondary markets.
FAB’s programme is well-established and has attracted buyers from Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. Each new series adds to a track record that investors monitor when assessing the bank’s ongoing funding strategy.
Gulf financial institutions, including Emirates NBD, Qatar National Bank, and Kuwait Finance House, have all tapped the EMTN market in recent years. Issuances typically range from $300 million to over $1 billion depending on market conditions and specific funding needs. FAB’s $300 million tranche is consistent with targeted, tactical raises rather than large-scale refinancing exercises.
FAB has room under its EMTN programme to issue additional series as market conditions evolve. With global interest rates potentially easing in the medium term, the bank may time future issuances to capture lower coupons. Investors watching the Gulf fixed-income space should track FAB’s filing activity for signals on the bank’s near-term funding plans.
For full regulatory details on this issuance, see the original report.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Consult a licensed financial adviser before making any investment decisions.
Do you think Gulf banks are making the right call by locking in fixed-rate funding now, or would a floating-rate strategy serve them better as global rates shift? Drop your thoughts in the comments below.






